Guard: A True Story of Duty, Sacrifice, and Leadership in Kentucky's Maximum Security Penitentiary
Step Behind the Bars: Experience life inside “The Castle,” Kentucky State Penitentiary, through the eyes of a seasoned prison guard.
Witness Unthinkable Events: From mass escapes and hostage crises to daily violence and racial tensions, every page delivers gripping, real-life drama.
Relive Harrowing Moments: Discover chilling details, including a highway crime spree where two officers were shot, and the struggles of managing executions.
Explore the Evolution of Justice: Learn how the penitentiary transformed from medieval punishments to modern-day practices, reflecting the changing face of the prison system.
Gain Unique Insights: Understand the toll on those tasked with managing society’s most dangerous individuals, as well as the compassion and resilience required for the job.
Perfect for True Crime and Memoir Fans: An unforgettable read for those captivated by real stories of duty, sacrifice, and leadership under extreme conditions. Dr. Norman Rose, professor of Sociology and Criminology at Kent State University, will be pairing Guard with his book, A Career in Corrections, for use with his students. When used together in a course, the books offer students the opportunity to read insightful perspectives of an instructor within the discipline and a correction officer within the field, providing them with a holistic and comprehensive understanding of work within the corrections system. https://titles.cognella.com/a-career-in-corrections-9798823310499
On January 12, 2007, what began as a felony tax trial for Ed and Elaine Brown in Plainfield, New Hampshire, spiraled into the longest armed standoff in U.S. Marshals history. Refusing to appear in court and surrender to federal authorities, the Browns transformed their home into a fortress, drawing support from militia groups and anti-government activists nationwide.
No One Has To Die offers an in-depth look at the tense and perilous nine month standoff that tested the resolve and tactics of the U.S. Marshals Service. Steve Monier, with contributions from Gary DiMartino and Dave Dimmitt, recounts the meticulous planning and tactical negotiations aimed at resolving the situation peacefully, against a backdrop of rising militia activity and public scrutiny.
This compelling narrative dives into the Browns' extremist beliefs, the challenges faced by law enforcement, and the strategies employed to prevent another Waco or Ruby Ridge. Through detailed accounts and personal insights, the book highlights the importance of communication, patience, and strategy in averting violence and ensuring that no one has to die.
4.8from 11 readers
Chapter 1
Not Just Another Day…
U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier arrived at his desk at approximately eight a.m. on Friday, January 12, 2007. This was going to be the fourth day of the trial for Ed and Elaine Brown of Plainfield, New Hampshire, on felony charges for conspiracy to commit federal income tax violations. The government had a very strong case, and the Browns were representing themselves.
A friend sympathetic to their cause, Michael Avery, from the suitably named Outlaw Legal Services of Florida, was serving as a “paralegal.” He had helped Ed and Elaine prepare all their pre-trial motions. He was seated at the defense table to “advise them.” The Browns had rejected any representation by an attorney.
It wasn’t going well for the Browns. Ed Brown’s spurious arguments against having to pay federal income taxes were rejected by the court, and his theories on the federal tax laws were shut down by presiding Judge Steven McAuliffe at several points. The government’s witnesses were showing that Ed and Elaine had stopped paying their taxes in 1996 and owed more than $625,000 in unpaid income tax. They were also charged with structuring, the intentional manipulation of financial transactions to evade reporting requirements.
As was his custom on getting to the office, Marshal Monier checked in with the control room upon arrival and spoke with the two court security officers manning the cameras and other systems monitoring courthouse activity that day. All was quiet, they said.
Marshal Monier and his chief deputy, Gary DiMartino, were both concerned about this trial. The U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) had deemed that the trial was “high risk” given that Ed Brown, a self-described “retired exterminator,” had become a leader in the militia group, U.S. Constitution Rangers. Membership in the rangers had grown in the aftermath of federal law enforcement’s attempts to serve arrest warrants at Ruby Ridge in Idaho and at the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. Chief DiMartino and Inspector Brenda Mikelson had ordered extra courtroom security and intelligence gathering for the trial. They had ensured that court security officers were being extra vigilant in screening people involved with, or attending, the trial in the U.S. District Court in Concord, New Hampshire.
Marshal Steve Monier and Chief DiMartino had worked together for the past five years in the District of New Hampshire. Chief DiMartino was a career deputy U.S. marshal who had risen through the ranks to become a chief deputy in the Marshals Service, the number two person in every one of the ninety-four district offices of the USMS.
Deputy U.S. marshals are highly trained federal law enforcement officers, not unlike career FBI, ATF, and IRS agents. They apply for open positions in the Marshals Service, take written and physical exams, and are subjected to background investigations prior to being hired. They attend, and must successfully complete, the USMS Academy and other advanced training programs throughout their career.
Gary DiMartino began his law enforcement career in a Rhode Island police department before applying for, and beginning, his calling with the USMS.
Because he had served in several supervisory positions on both the East and West Coasts during his long tenure with the agency and had taught at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Academy in Glynco, Georgia, he was a highly respected and well-known chief in the USMS. Marshal Monier considered him a very qualified, competent, and professional member of the service and was pleased that when President George W. Bush had nominated him to become the U.S. Marshal for the District of New Hampshire, Gary was his chief deputy.
Unlike the deputy U.S. marshals, who form the corps or “backbone” of the USMS, each U.S. marshal (USM) who heads the district offices of the USMS is nominated by the President of the United States and must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate before taking the oath of office. This has been the case since the U.S. Marshals Service was created in 1789 by the 1st Congress of the newly formed United States government.
When the 1st Congress of the United States stood up the federal judiciary, they realized there was no agency to enforce court orders, apprehend offenders, or help run the court system. In the Judiciary Act, the 1st Congress created the United States Marshals Service, with each marshal in each district to be appointed by the president with the “advice and consent” of the United States Senate.
President George Washington swore in the first thirteen U.S. marshals, including the first marshal of the District of New Hampshire, in 1789. The U.S. Marshals Service is our republic’s oldest federal law enforcement agency, with the broadest of authority in enforcing federal law and orders from the U.S. courts. For over 234 years, the U.S. Marshals have done everything from protecting the courts, to taking the census, to protecting the President of the United States.
In the twenty-first century, their core mission is the protection of the U.S. courts, enforcing court orders, apprehending fugitives, running the witness protection program, finding missing or abducted children, and taking the lead on enforcing the provisions of the Adam Walsh Act to track and monitor convicted sex offenders.
Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice made several legislative and administrative changes to how the work of the USMS was conducted over the decades, and in particular, in the twentieth century. Originally, each U.S. marshal could appoint his own deputies as needed, to carry out orders from the court.
As David S. Turk, the official historian of the Marshals Service, noted in his seminal work entitled Forging the Star, “[L]ong after gaining their Old West reputation with personnel such as Seth Bullock, Wyatt Earp, Bass Reeves, Bat Masterson, and Heck Thomas, U.S. Marshals and their deputies followed a winding trail of transition.”?i
At approximately nine-thirty on that Friday morning, Chief DiMartino stuck his head into the marshal’s office and said, “Marshal, Ed and Elaine failed to show up this morning for the continuation of their trial.”
It was a decisive moment in the long run-up to this point in the case of the United States v. Edward L. Brown & Elaine A. Brown. Their failure to appear was long feared by both Monier and DiMartino.
Both had had uneasy feelings about this case, since the district court’s magistrate judge released them on conditions, at their arraignment on May 24, 2006, on the income tax and other charges.
Among the conditions of release were that the Browns surrender all weapons to the USMS and the U.S. probation officers who would accompany them back to their Plainfield home. Further, they were to cooperate with, and report regularly to, the U.S. probation officers at the U.S. district court and appear at all future court proceedings.
Deputy U.S. marshals and U.S. probation officers drove Ed and Elaine back to their home in Plainfield to remove their weapons that day in May of 2006. Sharp-eyed deputy marshals noted the layout of the Browns’ home on the property, took photographs, and later sketched out the interior layout of the home. This proved to be pivotal in what ensued in the continuing Brown saga.
The deputies who went there also told Chief DiMartino that they didn’t believe Ed Brown had surrendered every weapon in his possession to the U.S. probation officers. The property, they reported, was simply too large and the house and outbuildings had too many places where firearms could be concealed.
Within a few hours of the morning the Browns failed to appear for the continuation of their trial, the news got worse. The USMS learned that heavily armed militia members and supporters of Ed Brown had gathered at the end of their long driveway leading to their hilltop home in Plainfield. Judge Steven McAuliffe issued warrants for the Browns’ arrest on failure to appear.
Initially, at the USMS and the prosecution’s request, the warrants were sealed. Chief Gary DiMartino counseled that the best course immediately was to call the Browns and convince them to return to court for the remainder of their trial. The marshal and Judge McAuliffe concurred, as Gary had carefully established a rapport with Ed and Elaine while they were detained in the Marshals Service’s detention facility at their arraignment in May.
“I had faith in Gary’s ability to use his considerable communications skills to convince the Browns that they should return to court to finish the trial,” Monier reported. Instead of immediately attempting to arrest the Browns at their home, where Ed’s armed followers had gathered, he consented to Gary’s suggestion that he try and convince them to return for the remainder of the trial.
Gary DiMartino spent the next three days talking with Ed and Elaine via telephone to do just that. The fact that the Browns took every one of his calls over that weekend was a positive.
At one point, it looked like the chief would be successful and that both Ed and Elaine would return to the court on Tuesday morning. Elaine was more noticeably willing to do that given the chief’s convincing arguments that this was a financial crime and that they need not take this to any further level.
Gary argued that it would be hard for them to continue to mount a defense if they weren’t in the courtroom to do so. The jury, he said, “will only hear the government’s side, and not yours.” As it turned out, Chief DiMartino was only partially successful.
Chief DiMartino continued to speak with them directly over the phone throughout the weekend and into the day on Monday, which was a holiday. On Tuesday morning, January 16th, Gary had brokered the return of the Browns for the remainder of their trial. Elaine Brown got into the car to return to the courthouse in Concord. At the last minute, however, Ed demurred and refused to get in the car.
This was a partial victory for the Marshals Service. While it isolated Ed Brown from Elaine, Ed was not alone. He was left with some die-hard armed militia supporters who shared his belief about the “corruption of the federal government.” Soon thereafter, others joined the group, including members of the “Free State” movement in New Hampshire who, while not professing violence themselves, joined in the discussion about the “overreach” of the federal government into the lives of ordinary Americans. A select number of the New Hampshire Free Staters, who preached an extreme form of libertarianism, supported the Browns.
In a letter posted on the internet shortly after Ed Brown’s public announcement that he would not be returning for the remainder of his trial, New Hampshire native William D. Miller wrote on a blog posting, “I am going to see Judge McAuliffe and U.S. Attorney Colantuono and various other officials hanged for treason for these actions.” In response, the U.S. Marshals Service issued a “be on the look-out” (BOLO) to area law enforcement in an attempt to locate Miller.
Miller, a New Hampshire resident who was living in Florida at the time, had a history of local law enforcement contacts. He was also an early disciple of Ed Brown and the Constitution Rangers and had been one of Ed’s followers for some time.
When Bill Miller learned of the trial, and Ed’s vow to fight any attempt to force him to return to the courtroom, Miller got in his car and drove nonstop from Florida “to protect Brown” at all costs. Miller was armed and ready to take on the role of “chief of staff” to Ed Brown when he arrived in Plainfield, New Hampshire, twenty-four hours later.
With Miller’s help initially, Brown made use of the internet, emails, blog postings, and media interviews almost immediately upon deciding that he was going to fight any attempts to arrest him or force him from his property.
“I will defend my property, and I am willing to die before going to jail…” Ed Brown told his followers. Apparently, Ed had concluded that he and Elaine were likely to be convicted at the conclusion of the trial. He was publicly critical of Judge McAuliffe and his rulings and, in interviews with the gathering media, called it a “kangaroo court.”
Word was quickly spreading through the militia, U.S. Constitution Rangers, and the sovereign citizen communities that things were heating up in Plainfield. Comments on blogging websites and emails about the federal government unfairly targeting the Browns were spreading hourly. Supporters were calling for all good patriots to stand up for them. One message being spread on anti-government websites was titled, “Will Plainfield be another Waco?”
Local and state media also began covering the Ed and Elaine Brown story. The NH Union Leader, New Hampshire’s only statewide newspaper, and the Concord Monitor, published in New Hampshire’s capital and widely distributed, and the Valley News (covering the Hanover, Lebanon, and Plainfield region) all took note. The marshal and chief assigned a deputy, who was particularly adept at high tech, IT, and the internet, to begin monitoring all activities related to the Browns. In a call to HQ, they asked that the Investigative Services Division (ISD) and the Intel Unit do the same.
On January 12, 2007, Margot Sanger-Katz, a reporter for the Concord Monitor (a prominent New Hampshire newspaper covering the capital city region) wrote one of her first news stories about the Browns’ trial when she reported on the first two days of it. The trial had already gained a local interest amongst the state’s papers and the statewide ABC-affiliated TV station, WMUR-TV 9, as supporters of the Browns demonstrated in front of the U.S. district courthouse.
Dave Ridley of Keene, New Hampshire, a member of the “Free State” movement in the state, held a sign reading “Ministry of Torture” in reference to “government-sanctioned torture with taxes.” “That’s why I support Ed,” Ridley told the Concord Monitor. “He’s standing up to the federal government.”
Ironically, Sanger-Katz’s article about the trial’s proceedings appeared on January 12th, the same day Ed and Elaine Brown both refused to return to the courthouse. The government was close to resting its case against the Browns after the testimony of the lead IRS agent handling the investigation and testimony from several postal service employees about the Browns’ habit of purchasing multiple postal money orders just below the $3,000 limit required for notification to the government of the transaction.
According to the government’s witnesses, this “structuring” of money orders is a common method to avoid paying income taxes. Over a two-year period, the Browns purchased more than $300,000 in money orders. Ed and Elaine, according to postal service investigators, would separately each wait in line and purchase a money order for $2,800.
At the close of the court’s proceedings on January 11th, both Browns told the court that they would begin their defense in the morning, and both told the judge that they planned to testify in their own defense.
Both, however, failed to return to court on Friday, January 12th.
On Tuesday, the 16th of January, 2007, the day that Elaine agreed to Chief DiMartino’s entreaties to return to court, she also agreed to have a court-appointed attorney, Bjorn Lange, represent her. Michael Avery, the paralegal, continued in his role and sat in on the plea negotiations between the government prosecutor and Attorney Lange.
Learning of the plea negotiations, Judge McAuliffe agreed to postpone the couple’s trial for another day when it appeared that Elaine Brown would be willing to reach a deal with the prosecution. That is, if she pled guilty to the extent of her criminal liability and conduct. As a dentist, Elaine Brown earned most of the couple’s income. She also had been charged with failing to collect employment taxes from the staff at her dental office in Lebanon.
The judge continued the trial for another day so that the government could calculate what they expected Dr. Brown would pay in back taxes and penalties and the terms of a prison confinement. Elaine was given until ten o’clock the following morning to make a decision on whether to accept a plea deal. If there was no deal, the judge ruled, the trial would continue with or without Ed Brown in the courtroom.
Because Elaine had failed to appear on Friday, the judge ordered new bail conditions for her. He ordered Dr. Brown to stay with her son in Worcester, Massachusetts, and not to return to her Plainfield, New Hampshire, home. She was only allowed telephonic contact with her husband, and she was ordered to wear an electronic ankle bracelet so that U.S. probation officers could monitor her whereabouts.
The Waco Branch Davidian standoff lasted fifty-one days. When both the Browns failed to appear on January 12, 2007, it set in motion what would become a nearly nine-month standoff, the longest armed standoff in the 234-year history of the U.S. Marshals Service. Would Plainfield, New Hampshire, join the lexicon of American history as another Waco or Ruby Ridge?
District of New Hampshire Chief Gary DiMartino, U.S. Marshal Steve Monier, and USMS Chief Regional Inspector Dave Dimmitt were determined not to let that happen.
In The Parking Lot Rapist, retired detective Lee DeVore recounts the harrowing investigation that led to the capture of a serial rapist and killer who terrorized Los Angeles and Orange Counties in the 1970s. This gripping true crime narrative begins with the tragic murder of nineteen-year-old Gina Marie Tisher and delves into the relentless pursuit of justice by the Fullerton Police Department.
DeVore provides his insider's view of the complex and meticulous investigation, revealing the strategies, challenges, and breakthroughs that ultimately led to the arrest and conviction of Kenneth Richard Hulbert. Through detailed accounts of key moments, including transcripts of Hulbert's chilling confessions, collaboration with various law enforcement agencies, and the emotional toll on the victims' families, DeVore paints a vivid picture of a community united in its fight against a monstrous predator.
The Parking Lot Rapist is more than just a detective's tale; it is a testament to the dedication, teamwork, and unwavering commitment of an entire police department. This compelling story captures the essence of true crime, highlighting the painstaking efforts and sacrifices made to bring a dangerous criminal to justice.
Whether you are a true crime enthusiast or simply seeking an authentic account of law enforcement's pursuit of justice, The Parking Lot Rapist offers an unflinching look at the resilience and determination necessary to protect and serve.
In Police Pranks, Jokes, and Other Stories Not Suitable for Children, retired Long Beach (California) police officer Richard “Buz” Williams collects nearly one hundred anecdotes of pranks, gags, and other antics played by law enforcement officers on other law enforcement and on suspects. Spanning from the 1930s to the present, Police Pranks shares some of the funniest moments handed down from Williams family, including both grandfathers, his father, great uncle, and cousin (all Los Angeles PD officers), from his time in the Long Beach PD, and from stories collected from other parts of the law enforcement world.
This collection of short stories is a perfect quick read for anyone interested in law enforcement or just a good laugh.
Billy The Liquor Guy spent twelve years as an undercover investigator working for New York’s Petroleum, Alcohol, and Tobacco Bureau (PATB), which enforces tax laws for imports into the state. Sounds pretty tame, right? In fact, it was challenging, harrowing, and life-threatening, leading Billy and his team to develop PTSD on the job and for years to come. Much of this is detailed in Billy’s first book, Under Too Long.
The Making of Billy the Liquor Guy fills in the rest of the story. It is a wide-ranging saga of undercover operations, criminal takedowns, and wild successes—as well as internal affairs investigations, betrayals, and serious repercussions stemming from the lack of trust and political game-playing in the bureau.
Not exactly a prequel, The Making of Billy the Liquor Guy gives the backstory behind Under Too Long, introduces familiar characters, and explains who Billy was when he began his career as an undercover operator, as well as what he became as a result of the stress, deception, and treachery he experienced in the PATB.
The Making of Billy the Liquor Guy is a must-read for anyone who wants to know what undercover operations, often romanticized in the media, are truly like, as well as anyone who enjoyed Billy’s first book, Under Too Long.
Sexual predators exist in our society and their evil desire leads them to commit heinous, brutal crimes with little concern for their victims or the toll it takes on the community. Violent sociopaths have no interest in the needs or safety of anyone else and see ordinary people as either targets or competitors. They have no hesitation taking what they want from their victims. Whether they are rapists, pedophiles, or murderers, these monsters will do whatever it takes to get their needs met and their evil desires satisfied.
Captain Dean T. Olson (retired) is a veteran crimes detective with the Douglas County (Nebraska) Sheriff’s Office, serving the Omaha area. In his 30-year law enforcement career he has seen some of the most horrible crimes committed by one person against another and he has arrested some of the worst sexual predators the nation has ever seen.
Guard: A True Story of Duty, Sacrifice, and Leadership in Kentucky's Maximum Security Penitentiary
In 1978, Philip Parker started his decades-long career as a prison guard at the Kentucky State Penitentiary, a place known as "The Castle" for its medieval look. On his first day, a mass escape set the tone for the dangerous and intense journey ahead. Over the years, Parker faced numerous challenges, from federal court allegations to life-threatening situations, including a dramatic hostage crisis with a notorious inmate.
Parker's memoir takes readers through the emotions and realities of prison life. From handling daily violence and suicides to witnessing murders caused by racial tension and other conflicts, Parker describes the harsh environment of the prison. Guard includes detailed accounts of harrowing events, like the highway crime spree where two of his colleagues were shot.
The book also covers the evolution of the prison itself, from its early days with medieval punishments to modern-day improvements. Parker shares his experiences as a warden, dealing with staff corruption, inmate violence, and the heavy responsibility of carrying out court-ordered executions.
Guard is a vivid and honest account of a life spent managing the worst in human behavior while finding moments of compassion and redemption. It highlights the dedication and resilience required to maintain order in such a challenging environment, and offers a unique perspective on the sacrifices made by those who work in the prison system.
As a young man, Don Redden didn’t have big plans for his future beyond raising a family, a good career at General Electric, and making it through the Vietnam War alive. His plan was simple, honest, and safe. When Don’s tour of duty in the Army was over and he got home alive, it looked like he was on track to achieve everything he had set out to do.
A chance encounter with an FBI agent led him to make a momentous decision and abandon the safe path he had set for himself. He would apply to join the FBI. This began the adventure of a lifetime. From bank robberies to kidnappings to murder, Don did what he had to, sometimes against protocol and sometimes against instinct, to protect those he could and bring justice for those he couldn’t.
Detective Chris McMullin's career of finding missing people and solving murders wasn't just his job. It was his passion and dedication to helping victims.
For thirty years, Chris worked at the Bensalem Police Department in Pennsylvania. He started as a patrol officer and became a detective in the Special Victims Unit, where he handled cases involving murderers, sexual predators, and violent criminals. Some of his most important cases included Lisa Todd, Christian Rojas, Tracy Byrd, and Barbara Rowan, a 14-year-old girl who was murdered in 1984 and whose case wasn't solved for 31 years. The Rowan case was especially important to Chris and motivated him to work on cold cases.
3 Decades Cold tells the story of Chris's impressive career, from joining the police academy in 1991 to his retirement and beyond.
Today, Chris McMullin works as a Lieutenant for the Bucks County Sheriff's Office in Pennsylvania. He now leads a nonprofit organization to work on cold cases and has a true crime TV show in development.
In 2007, agents of the New York State Petroleum, Alcohol, and Tobacco Bureau (PATB) seized over half a million dollars in untaxed alcohol, drugs, and guns. This takedown, the largest in New York history, led to 87 arrests, the recovery of an unprecedented quantity of cocaine, crack, and marijuana, and captured the attention of law enforcement agencies all around the world.
Under Too Long is the story of the PATB undercover team that led this investigation, as seen through the eyes of “Billy the Liquor Guy.” Billy’s twelve-year odyssey into the world of undercover operations led him to dine in the homes of the “bad guys, ” buy bombs from a man in Yonkers, travel to Tunisia to find an informant, and be hired as a hit man. But his undercover life took an enormous toll on Billy and his family, almost destroying them both. The only thing he could rely upon to get him through were his confidence, his sense of humor, and his team.
This story combines true life investigation, graphic behind-the-scenes scenarios, and a personal tale about what happens psychologically to an agent when he’s undercover too long.
Under too Long is available in paperback, hardcover, and ebook editions.
In Obsessed: My Relentless Pursuit of the Zodiac Killer, Dr. Mark Hewitt invites readers into his gripping journey of unraveling one of America's most enduring mysteries. Dr. Hewitt, an expert on the Zodiac case, shares his transformation from a pastor to a dedicated true crime investigator.
This memoir details Dr. Hewitt's meticulous research, personal encounters, and the profound impact of the Zodiac case on his life. Moving to California reignited his passion, leading him to explore crime scenes and connect with other enthusiasts. His relentless pursuit is not only about the Zodiac but also about understanding the complexities of human nature and the quest for truth.
Obsessed: My Relentless Pursuit of the Zodiac Killer provides a unique blend of personal narrative and investigative insight, offering readers a compelling look at the determination and challenges faced by those who seek to solve cold cases. Join Dr. Hewitt as he navigates the twists and turns of this enigmatic case, shedding light on his life's work and his unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth.
In the summer of 2000, a small fire in a condo basement in Malden, Massachusetts, seemed like just another routine call. But behind the smoke was something far more disturbing—a violent scene with no victim in sight. Detective Lieutenant Bill Powers of the Massachusetts State Police and his team of seasoned investigators joined forces with local detectives to uncover what happened in that quiet building.
As the team dug deeper, they faced a complex case without a body, a confession, or clear answers. Clues came slowly: strange behavior from a tenant, a missing person no one had reported, and a hidden crime scene soaked not only in water and gasoline—but in blood. With persistence and teamwork, they traced the path of a young woman, Kelly Hancock, a runaway who had vanished without a trace.
This book follows every step of the investigation, from the moment firefighters broke down the door to the final verdict in a packed courtroom. Along the way, it reveals the work of detectives, prosecutors, forensic scientists, and everyday people who helped bring justice to a victim whose voice was almost lost.
Told with care and clarity, When the Smoke Cleared isn’t just about solving a murder—it’s about what it takes to stand up for someone when no one else will.
Chapter 1
The Crime Scene
Few things can piss off a cop or firefighter quicker than an unexpected, surprise callout at the end of a shift. Just ask any one of us and watch for the narrowing of the eyes and the scowl or wince that crosses our face remembering times when it happened. The recall is usually negative because it caused the cancelation or alteration of premade plans. On occasion, though, you might hear, “Except there was this one time when something seemingly small and inconsequential turned into something big and far-reaching, and we later found out we were standing on the tip of an iceberg—and I’m glad I was there and that we got it right.”
Tuesday, July 18, 2000, was a warm, muggy summer morning in Malden, MA. The rising sun was barely visible as it strained to bore a hole through the overcast sky and shine its blinding orange light onto the awakening land below. It’s what guys on the mid-shift referred to as God’s searchlight, making an opening to brighten the day. For those rolling out of their beds it was a welcome sight, but for those up all night it meant squinting through some tired eyes, as the glare made for difficult driving at the end of a shift.
An unremarkable twenty-four-hour tour of duty was winding down for the firefighters assigned to the trucks at the Salem Street Fire Headquarters. They were packing their ditty bags and watching the clock. At seven a.m., they would be out the door and heading home to get breakfast for their kids or off to their second job in one of the trades. However, at precisely 6:21 a.m., the blare of the stationhouse alarm signaling a report of fire disrupted their getaway plans. The call came from Master Box 3121 at the Malden Mills condo complex at the corner of Eastern Avenue and Linwood Street, a building less than a half mile away.
“Shit, shit, shit! I swear to Christ this happens every freaking time we are ready to go and I have family plans!” one of the guys bellowed out. It was what everyone else was thinking. “You know it is some dipshit who burned his bagel while he played in the shower and it tripped the freaking alarm,” he added.
But it wasn’t a call they could ignore or a decision they had to make. Like it or not, they had just moments to gear up and jump onto the truck as the huge white overhead doors rolled up, the red lights flared to life, and the high-pitched scream of the siren announced to the neighborhood that they were pulling out and needed clear passage.
The deputy chief led the way in the company car, and both Engine 1 and Ladder 1 followed as they rolled across Salem Street. They screamed down Holden Street past Malden High School on the right before taking a left onto Eastern Avenue, and after a few hundred yards, they took a quick right and immediate left into the parking lot for the condo complex. The entire trip took less than a minute and a half.
As they jumped from the apparatus, the firefighters could hear the alarms blaring inside and watched as the residents slowly streamed into the parking lot in their nightclothes or business attire. There was a noticeable but faint smell of smoke with no visible flame. This was certainly more than the burnt toast they had groused about as they dressed for the call.
They went about the business of coupling and pulling hose from the truck, attaching it to the nearby hydrant, dragging it into the building, and once the nozzle man was poised and ready to enter the fire scene, they would charge the line with water and ready for the attack.
The deputy ran up the front stairs, entering through the glass doors, and located the fire alarm annunciator panel on the wall. A flashing icon indicated the alarm was coming from the basement level in the function room located down a flight of stairs from the atrium-style entrance. He detected a light haze of smoke wafting up from the stairwell.
Captain Trimble from Engine 1 hooked a nozzle onto a hose neatly tucked into the wall beside the first floor standpipe and stretched it out. This would be a backup to the larger hose and would draw its water from inside of the building. They descended the stairs to the basement level and headed toward the function room in the familiar attack formation firefighters trained on for decades. There were two doors to the function room and the deputy, with a key handed to him by a trustee, unlocked the nearest, and apparently safest, one.
There was light smoke coming from the edges of that door, but the firefighter’s eyes focused on a second entrance door about thirty feet farther down the hallway. They noted smoke and soot marks at the top of the door and smoke and water pouring out the bottom and into the hallway rug, a clear sign to them that was the hotspot, or the place where the fire was concentrated.
Trimble opened the door cautiously, and saw the billowing smoke gather and rush into his direction. He slammed it shut and told the other firefighters to mask up before they pushed their way in.
Dan Thoman, an eighteen-year veteran, was the nozzle man from Engine 1 and the first to enter the room in front of the captain. The big hose was perched on his shoulder, the activating lever at his fingertips ready to set in motion at the first sight of flame. The open doorway now provided a natural exit route for the thick, acrid smoke that had been building inside. It charged toward the firefighters with fury, turning the visibility to zero. The stench from the smoke had the unmistakable odor and taste of a petroleum product, probably gasoline. Trimble put his hand onto Thoman’s back, and they inched deeper into the room with their right shoulders rubbing along the wall, grasping the hose like a lifeline that would allow them to back out of the room if it became treacherous or unbearable inside.
The firefighters entered the room into a small kitchenette area. On the left side of the room there was a makeshift dining area with portable tables and chairs. After twenty feet, the right wall ended and the room opened wide to a living room area complete with a couch, comfortable chairs and a glass table. The second wave of firefighters entered from behind, and using their Halligan tools, smashed the four ceiling level windows to vent the smoke and then shut down the sprinkler system. After the heaviest smoke made a hasty escape, their view became a lot clearer. They pushed up their masks and quickly surveyed the scene. They extinguished what remained of the smoldering fire, which appeared limited to the living room section. The flood of water that poured from the ceiling sprinklers suppressed the spread of flame, so the fire damage was minimal and limited to the rug and furniture, but the damage from the smoke and water was extensive. The room was in disarray, and a love seat and chair lay tipped over, as did a glass table. There were several inches of water on the floor streaked with an iridescent sheen, and a strong odor of gasoline remained in the air, all unmistakable signs of an arson—and based on what they saw, maybe other crimes as well.
Seventeen years of training and experience told the captain this was likely an arson case and a criminal police matter.
“Hey, guys!” Captain Trimble bellowed over the commotion. “I think this room is definitely a crime scene, so treat it accordingly. Continue to search for victims and hotspots, and vent the smoke and water, but don’t, under any circumstances, touch or move anything, or you’ll be in court explaining to the judge why you did.”
He called into the dispatch center and requested they summon Malden PD detectives to the scene. Sergeant Steve Ruelle and Inspector Johnny Rivers from the criminal bureau were heading in for the day shift when they heard the call and rerouted their approach to the fire scene at the occupied condo complex.
Ruelle and Rivers had a long, cooperative history with the deputy and the captain. Rivers had been the department’s Arson Investigator for years and responded to virtually every suspicious fire scene. The four met outside the building, and the deputy got right to the point.
“This is a weird set of circumstances,” he started, “the sprinklers knocked the fire down before we got here, but there was a huge mass of thick black smoke and it reeked of gasoline, so I obviously thought it might be an arson. When we got to the source, though, there were chairs and a table knocked over, and it didn’t come from us. I’m no expert, but it looks like there may be some blood on the furniture and maybe the walls, but it could be soot from the fire. I’m just not sure. But you guys taught me that it is your call and always better to be safe than sorry. That’s why I called for you.”
They all went inside, and after a few minutes of looking around and smelling the obvious accelerant, Rivers said he wanted to reach out to the State Fire Marshal’s office for added expertise. When he called, he specifically asked that they bring Lucy, their arson-sniffing dog, along for the ride.
The detectives were sloshing around the function room in their rubber boots, rough sketching the scene, and documenting their initial observations when Lucy poked her head into the room. She announced her presence with a series of excited whines, and she was straining on her leash and panting to get to work. Lucy was a highly trained and decorated accelerant detection canine. At the other end of her tether was Paul Horgan, a state police sergeant attached to the Fire Marshal’s office. Lucy and Paul had met more than seven years earlier at a training in Connecticut, and they were inseparable from that moment on. They trained together every step of the way, always receiving their certifications as a team.
There were still a couple of inches of water flowing out the door and into the building’s drainage pipe when Lucy first put her nose to the water. She alerted on four distinct stain areas, sitting and wagging her tail each time, looking up to Horgan for approval and a couple of kibbles from his pocket. When she wasn’t signifying an alert, normally Lucy would stand and wait for the next command. This day, however, she bent her head down and lapped at the water around the stains in the carpet. No matter how many times Horgan tugged at the leash to keep her focused, Lucy kept going back to the water.
He turned to Rivers and said, “John, I know this sounds crazy, but the only time I have to pull her away from drinking water at a fire scene is when there is blood or ‘deco’ (body decomposition) in the mix. I think we have a lot more than an arson here.”
###
Pat Silva, another investigator from the Fire Marshal’s office, arrived shortly after Horgan to help with the investigation. Pat began his professional career as a full-time firefighter a few miles up the road in Salem, MA, where he worked for eight years before switching gears and careers when he joined the ranks of the state police. It was safe to say he knew his way around both a fire scene and an investigation. The responsibility of determining the cause and origin of the fire would fall to him. After some introductory conversation about what they knew and what they were learning, Pat thought it was critical to reach out to Crime Scene Services for a trained specialist to photograph, fingerprint, and document the entire room.
When the water level was near zero and the smoke had cleared, a couple of large pinkish-colored stains appeared on the rug and there were similar noticeable spots and blotches on the furniture. Deeper and closer inspection of the wall by the door showed what appeared to be reddish-brown smears and possible blood spatter. Lucy’s instincts were right on the money, and she earned a bonus cookie or two for her efforts.
Silva then called the crime lab and requested assistance from a chemist to collect the arson evidence for further analysis and to test and collect any of the apparent bloodstains that were starting to show through the saturated surfaces.
In an unconventional and unscientific way, Lucy confirmed what Ruelle and Rivers were already thinking. Her instinctive behavior changed the focus and concern from the original call for an arson to a more intense investigation of a potentially violent crime.
Johnny Rivers made the call to the state police office in the Middlesex DAO to request assistance. He thought it might not turn out to be a homicide, but there was no sense waiting for a victim before they activated the full team. Ruelle and Rivers preferred to be proactive in cases like this where the need for a death investigation was apparent. They wanted a full team in place advancing the case together from the beginning. Experience told them things always went better that way.
###
I was at my desk when the phone rang at around eleven a.m. Lana fielded the call. Her seat was located a few steps from my office and within easy hearing range. I wasn’t eavesdropping, but I caught her friendly voice, “Hi, Jimmy, where are you guys? With Rivers and Ruelle? That must be good for a few laughs.”
For a few seconds, she was quiet and a small gasp seeped out while she listened Then, in a much different tone, she commented, “Oh wow, really? Oh my God! Seriously?” and then a pause, followed by, “Yeah, he’s right here. I’ll put him on.”
Lana had a cheerful disposition, and her delightful laughter usually filled her conversations, but not this time. I sensed trouble when she turned in her seat and simply said, “Billy, I have Jimmy Connolly on the phone, and he needs to talk to you.”
Lana transferred the call, I answered and listened as Jimmy said, “Good morning Boss. I don’t know if you got the heads-up on this, but I’m with Duke and Eddie, and we are over in Malden at a fire in a condo building. It’s an interesting situation. It looks as though someone started a fire in the function room to try to cover up a crime scene. There’s a couple of big pinkish stains on the floor and what looks like blood spatter on the walls. So far, the firefighters have pumped out about a foot of water that poured out of the sprinkler system and smothered the fire before it could do any heavy damage. They cleared the residents to return, but most of them are just grabbing some stuff and leaving or going to work.
“It might be a good idea if you filled the DA in and then headed this way. We are at the Malden Mills Condo building on Linwood Street where it intersects with Eastern Avenue.”
My first thoughts were that it had all the indicators of a major crime scene that could gain a great deal of media attention and we would need to prepare for that eventuality. More importantly, and because of the complexity of issues, particularly the potential legal ones around search and seizure as well as evidence collection, we needed to have someone from the DAO on-scene to guide us through the maze. I asked Jimmy if Adrienne Lynch, the chief of the Malden division of the Middlesex DAO was aware of the situation. He reminded me that she was in Columbia, SC, lecturing at a DA’s conference and wouldn’t be back until Monday. Gerard Butler, a senior ADA, was filling in for her, and he expected him to arrive shortly.
The distance from our office in the Cambridge Courthouse to the scene in Malden was a little less than six miles, and with regular congestion and traffic it could be a half an hour ride. Flashing blue lights and a blaring siren could open the pathway and shorten the travel time, but as the crime scene was secure and under control, my arriving a few minutes sooner wasn’t going to help solve anything and would only piss off every commuter I passed. The slower trip also gave me plenty of time to think through the facts, as I knew them, and start to formulate a game plan to make sure all our bases were covered. It was a great comfort knowing that the best-trained crime scene specialists were either on-scene or would be in short order and that the detectives from both the Malden PD and the state police were experienced and knowledgeable. Most importantly, we had worked together in the past on other homicides with very successful outcomes.
My fundamental role as the detective lieutenant throughout a death investigation was one of oversight and direction. Experience and guidance mattered most, the institutional memory gained from literally hundreds of past investigations coupled with the battle scars and remembrances of both screw-ups and successes. My goal was always to diminish the former and accentuate the latter.
The detectives working on the case did the bulk of the work. In this instance, as in most others in my office, my detectives had a history of working together and great investigative instincts, a passion to solve the case, and most importantly, relied on one another to prevent mistakes. We all worked as a team and had no tolerance for lone wolves who wandered off and followed their impulses rather than the plan. When working with competent detectives and ADAs, it often reminds me of a quote from Mahatma Gandhi, “There go my people. I must follow them, for I am their leader.”
When I arrived at the scene, firefighters were washing down the equipment and returning it to their trucks. Strands of dark smoke were still streaming out of the broken windows on the building’s ground level, and there was a noticeable stench of gasoline in the air. There were several people milling around in the lot that I presumed were residents and neighbors.
Jimmy Connolly and Johnny Rivers walked over to me as I approached the building's entrance. A few moments later, Steve Ruelle, Duke Donoghue, and Ed Forster broke away from what they were doing and joined the conversation.
They were gathering information from personal observations and conversations with firefighters, and were in the beginning stages of interviewing residents, neighbors, and people working in nearby businesses. Canvassing is a long and tedious part of any investigation and perhaps the second least favorite, just ahead of diving into putrid dumpsters looking through garbage bags for hidden evidence.
We talked for a few minutes about the uniqueness of what they discovered, then they brought me in to look at the crime scene firsthand. After a quick familiarization with the room and the scene as the firefighters first encountered it, I spoke with Pat Silva. Although a trooper now, Pat still spoke in firefighter’s jargon. He talked of the “fire load” and said it was limited to the furnishings in the living room section of the function room. He said there were no accidental heat sources that could have caused a fire. He went on to describe what he considered a pour pattern (the manner of distribution of the accelerant prior to ignition). He pointed out a trail of burn areas and soot marks that supported his comments and mentioned that Lucy’s “hits” for accelerants were consistent with what the physical evidence showed. Lastly, Silva pointed to the six sprinkler heads in the living room section and noted that the fire activated four of them, which poured down with enough pressure and volume to drown the fire shortly after it began. He noted the four open heads centered in the area where the fire occurred. There was still a lot of work to do, but he said he was confident that he would be able to establish the cause and origin of the fire.
In addition to the two pinkish blotches in the rug by the furniture, there were also areas of reddish-brown stains on lower parts of the wall nearest to the unlocked door. John Drugan, the crime lab chemist, joined the conversation. “Guys, I think these preliminary tests are affirming what we thought. They have all been positive for blood, and the quick reaction to the chemicals has been dramatic.”
Silva’s experienced eyes allowed him to offer an initial opinion that someone caused the fire by spreading an ignitable liquid over the love seat, chair, and flooring, and then introduced an open flame to the accelerant. The fire spread laterally across the floor and onto the chair and love seat. As the fire progressed, the increasing heat set off the sprinkler heads, which consumed and extinguished the flames. It was the collective opinion of all present that someone had set the fire intentionally and deliberately to cover up and contaminate the scene of a violent crime.
A quick study of the visual evidence, including the bloodstains, suggested there had been a chaotic fight in the room prior to setting it ablaze.
While the specialists continued to comb the crime scene for signs of trace and physical evidence, my team wandered away to pick up where they left off, interviewing anyone and everyone in the area who might have seen or witnessed something unusual or remarkable before, during, or after the fire alarm sounded.
Perhaps the most difficult circumstance at the start of every case is that detectives come in blind and work backward to gain information. Initial observations of a crime scene are important, but what we see is the aftermath of the event. We need to find witnesses with information that supports and/or explains what we, the detectives, saw. As the saying goes, “We don’t know what we don’t know,” and the only way to learn is by talking with people and learning from them. Eyewitnesses are the best sources, but unfortunately, like all gems, they are rarely easy to find. In many instances, they have left the scene to go about their business, thinking someone else will be there to fill in the blanks for the police. At other times, they are afraid of real or imagined consequences and leave hoping to remain anonymous. In yet other circumstances, they are in the wrong place at the wrong time and have a fear of discovery because their presence could put their marriage or employment in jeopardy. On occasion, they just don’t like or trust the police or the criminal justice system. Regardless of the reason, locating honest cooperating witnesses can be a difficult task.
The canvassing spread out in two directions: first with the condo residents then with the people working at the neighboring businesses. Most of the initial resident interviews were quick because many had left after the fire alarms went off, and those who remained had mostly been asleep at the time and had nothing to offer in the way of observations or personal thoughts. To be thorough, my investigators would return later that evening and for several days afterward to ensure they spoke with every resident. This gave everyone the opportunity to share information about not only the fire but also any suspicions they may have about people they had seen in the building or scuttlebutt they had picked up from neighbors about possible suspects or persons of interest. There didn’t appear to be any forced entry into the building, so there was every reason to believe the assailant was either a resident or a guest of one.
Just as important as the gathering of information, the opportunity to create some face time between the police and residents is valuable. First impressions are lasting and can go a long way in building trust. Knowing there is a police presence and an active investigation helps to calm some of their fears. A simple handshake and exchange of a business card can be the opening to a positive dialogue that might not take place at that moment or for weeks, months, or even a year. Then, if that person either learns more information or has prior information they were initially unwilling to share, they have a number to call, and the person on the other end will be a detective with whom they have already met and shared a conversation.
It was evident from speaking with several residents that they were understandably scared and concerned for their safety and security. From our initial dialogues, we learned that they were not all cut from the same bolt of cloth. Most of the units were owner occupied, but several were sublets. Many residents worked at white and blue-collar mid-wage professions, while others were, for any number of different reasons, without work and around the property most days. This was by no means a homogeneous community. This wasn’t the setting the writers considered when they created Melrose Place. None of the residents shared that there was a big, happy family feeling atmosphere throughout the building. It was a decent place to live but not one with smiley face welcome mats lying beneath unlocked doors.
There were pockets or small groups that knew one another in a superficial but friendly way. They might share some Chinese food from the restaurant across the street, watch a movie together, or even go halves on the cost of some recreational drugs, but that was about it. Most stayed to themselves and, at least while they were there, walked softly and wore blinders and earplugs.
With the outside interviews completed and the function room in the competent hands of the crime scene and arson specialists, my onsite detectives ventured into the management office on the first floor to learn a bit more about the building and the people who called it home. They got a list of the residents and a floor plan showing fifty-five housing units that corresponded with those names. The manager was cooperative and knowledgeable, answering questions as best he could. He also provided a little insight regarding a few of the residents, and why they might or might not be willing to speak with us. The manager told them that the function room was not a gathering spot, and rarely did anyone use it at night. The doors remained locked, and the only way to access it was with a key. Keys were few, and they were in the sole possession of the trustees or in the management office. He only loaned out the keys for planned, preapproved events and always got them back from the renters.
Steve Ruelle was combing through the manifest when he noted the name Lester Morovitz in Condo Number 115. “Isn’t he the guy who owns the taxi company across the street?” he asked.
“Yes,” was the reply, “but he doesn’t live here. He’s on the deed, but his kid lives there with a woman and two kids. His name is Tommy Crouse. He is an odd duck, coming and going all hours of the day and night, but he doesn’t cause problems. I think he works for his old man. He would be a good person to speak with, but I don’t think he was around this morning. I didn’t see his Chevy Blazer out there.”
The taxi service operated twenty-four hours a day, so there was always someone fielding calls in the office’s dispatch center. Eddie, Duke, and Ruelle took a walk across the street to see if Morovitz was in his office. Fortunately, he was, and he invited them in. After introductions and small talk about the fire and the weather, they asked him what he knew about Tommy Crouse.
“Oh, Tommy’s my stepson; I’m married to his mother. When they fixed up the building and turned it into condos a few years ago, I bought one of them so Tommy, his girlfriend, Esther Fournier, and their kids would have a place to live and I could keep an eye on him. He works here for me. He’s an unreliable employee, but what am I going to do? He’s family.”
They asked if he knew where Tommy was, and he said the whole family had gone to visit with Esther’s family in New Hampshire earlier in the morning.
“They were fortunate,” he recalled. “They left a few minutes before the fire alarm went off. Tommy called me early this morning and told me Esther had the ‘itches’ really bad and she had to go to a doctor but her medical insurance was in New Hampshire and she had no coverage in Massachusetts.”
Morovitz reached for his cell phone and quickly scanned through it to see what time he had spoken with Crouse in the morning. “Here, he called to tell me at five forty-five a.m.” Eddie Forster asked him if he thought five forty-five a.m. was a little early for a wake-up phone call from his stepson to say he wouldn’t be in for work. Lester told them he had thought it was a bit odd at the time, but so were many things about Tommy Crouse. He said he thought it would be best if they talked directly to him about the fire and his early departure. He added that he spoke with Crouse several times during the day and he got the impression that Tommy wasn’t planning on coming back tonight. Morovitz gave them Crouse’s home and cell phone numbers as well as an address in Candia, NH, for Esther’s parents.
As the day wore on, our team made telephone calls to area hospitals asking about emergency room visits with unexplained, serious injuries. We alerted the OCME to the situation, and they promised to notify us if they received a call to any death scenes with unexplained injuries.
The canvass wore on, and my detectives approached people on the street, at the bus stop in front of the building, and in the parking lot of the condo complex, and questioned them about anything they may have seen that seemed unusual or out of the ordinary as they headed out earlier in the day. Most shrugged their shoulders and had little or nothing to offer. The condo owners were just glad the sprinklers suppressed the fire with minor damage and they were able to return to their homes. The check marks next to the names on the building’s roster grew by the hour, but there was little information gained.
A tenant who lived in a unit on the third floor that overlooked the parking lot and Eastern Avenue was different. He turned out to be the guy who inaugurated the flow of relevant information that the officers were waiting to hear. Duke and Pat Silva spoke with him as he arrived home from work. Duke opened the conversation and told him they were investigating a small fire in the function room. Duke only referred to the fire and not their suspicions of violence. The tenant said he had wanted to speak to the police all day about his early morning observations.
“I have a regular daily routine I follow on workdays,” he said. “Today was no different. At around five thirty a.m., I took the elevator down to the first floor and was heading toward the front door and out to my car for the short drive to where I work in Cambridge. I remember when I stepped out of the elevator; I heard voices coming from the doorway of the condo to my immediate right. The guy who lives there is Tommy Crouse; he lives there with his girlfriend, and they have two kids. When I walk through the lobby toward the front door I pass by an open area, and I can see right down to the floor below where the function room is located. I don’t remember seeing or smelling anything unusual.”
He continued, saying that normally he never saw anyone in the parking lot that early in the morning but that day had been different.
“Once I stepped outside, I noticed Tommy Crouse walking away from his blue Chevy Blazer, pulling an empty child’s wagon behind him. He has his own parking spot, but he’d parked in a space reserved for visitors and close to the handicap ramp that led into the building. We never said anything to each other, and I don’t know if Crouse even saw me.”
The tenant asked a few questions, focusing on whether or not the fire was deliberately set. Pat simply replied, “That is what we are trying to determine, and the information you are sharing is very helpful to us reaching a conclusion.” The tenant went on to tell Pat and Duke that he first learned of the fire when his girlfriend called him at work with the news around seven a.m.
“I’ve been thinking about it all day and how odd it was to see Crouse pulling a kid’s wagon in the parking lot at the crack of dawn.” He said he was relieved that the officer’s spoke with him and gave him a chance to share what little he knew. Neither the tenant nor the investigators realized it at that moment, but they had just begun to pry the lid off Pandora’s Box.
After talking with the tenant and Morovitz, everyone started to feel and believe that the slow, painstaking, but logical march toward the truth had begun. We knew we had a crime scene with bloodstains and blood spatter on the walls, obvious signs of a brutal fight, and an accelerant-rich fire that was apparently set to destroy any physical evidence. That was a good start, but we still had no victim, no known eyewitnesses, no weapon, no talk on the street, and no missing person report. We were officially nowhere, but we were starting to head somewhere.
The initial crime scene processing was completed by late afternoon, and until everything inside dried and the smoke completely cleared, there was little more that could be done. Before the troopers, crime lab chemists, and the Fire Marshal’s officers left, they briefed Connolly on what they were able to do and what still needed completing. They collected several pieces of possible evidence, including blood and water samples from the floor, walls, and furniture and burnt areas of cloth from the furniture and the rug. The seized samples would go to the state police crime laboratory for testing. The crime scene officers would be back in a day or so when the room had dried and the smoke had completely cleared to finish their work. The Fire Marshal’s officers would be back as well to further inspect and test the fire suppression system and seek out other evidence and witnesses. We planned to be back very early in the morning to pick up where we left off. Canvassing and the search for witnesses and evidence would come first for us.
An issue that arises at the start of all investigations is the urgency of getting the primary work done and then prioritizing the next steps. Everyone involved has an already open and burgeoning caseload that requires him or her to break away for days at a time to complete a myriad of responsibilities surrounding their other cases. The big advantage to the team concept is that members can drop from sight for a day or a week to attend to other business and the investigation will continue seamlessly with the other team members filling in as and where needed.
It is also the reason that team members meet or speak daily, either in person or on the telephone. They share and review the information gathered from new interviews, talk about potential leads that require follow-up, and discuss lab results that trickle in from evidence seized at the crime scene, autopsy findings, and questions from the medical examiner. The meetings keep everyone engaged and updated so there is no disruption or need to reeducate later.
###
Darkness was settling in, and the summer air was cooling off after the rain had passed. It had been a miserable day punctuated at several points with drenching downpours. The early momentum was waning, and fatigue was growing. Everyone was physically and emotionally exhausted and very, very hungry. The initial adrenaline rush for all of us had long since passed. Everyone had sweated through their clothes more than once that day, and we all smelled of the oily, acrid smoke that had settled into our shirts and pants from the time spent mucking around in the function room. There was a feeling in all of us that this was probably a good time to hit the pause button and stop for the day. Go home, throw the grungy clothes into a plastic bag, shower, grab a beer and some food, and get a good night’s rest. We could gather at the Malden PD early in the morning, review what we had learned, discuss any new information that might come in overnight, and formulate a game plan for the day. There were always things to do, but we also had to follow the evidence and be prepared to adjust the plans when more relevant and important information became available. Adapting to a changing environment and redirecting our attention happens in every case; following a predetermined template never works.
As we stood in the condo parking lot and discussed our next steps, the one piece of information we couldn’t get away from was that Tommy Crouse had left at the break of dawn to go to New Hampshire with his family—and they had fortuitously left moments before the alarms went off.
“Seriously,” Jimmy Connolly said, “who does that? Think about it. At five thirty in the morning, you wake up two little kids and your girlfriend from a sound sleep, get them dressed, pile them into a car, and drive an hour-plus to New Hampshire. The only urgency to the trip is your girlfriend has the itches and wants to see a doctor in New Hampshire. It makes no sense at all.”
There was concern that waiting overnight wasn’t the right answer. Johnny Rivers spoke up and said, “Look, Crouse is Morovitz’s stepson, and whether he likes him or not, we know he’s already been on the phone telling him we were there and asking questions about him and his early departure and we were looking to talk with him. Crouse and his girlfriend are probably already trying to create an alibi and get their story straight.”
There was a unified and, at least for this group of detectives, obvious reaction. Duke said what everyone else was thinking.
“Look, we don’t think they are returning tonight. We know what we want to do and really must do: blitz them with questions now. Let’s jump in a cruiser, head up to New Hampshire, and catch them by surprise. They will never expect that we would be knocking on their door tonight. They will be shocked and disorganized when they see us. Let’s go and catch them off guard.”
We all agreed. With a new shot of adrenaline to the system, there was a noticeable and collective rise in the energy level. Steve, Johnny, Eddie, and Duke piled into Eddie’s unmarked Crown Vic and headed north at “state police speed,” which normally cuts fifteen minutes off an hour and a half ride. On the way up Route 93 to New Hampshire, they talked over what they had learned, what they didn’t yet know, and what they hoped to learn from the interviews. They came up with a few common questions for both Crouse and Fournier so they could compare their memories and answers. They also wanted to speak with her parents and see what they knew and what they had observed during the day.
Earlier in the evening, a couple of Malden’s night detectives had dropped by for a briefing on the case and to offer their help. Once the cruiser headed off to Candia, they headed back to their station to continue the search for a victim. With no information other than a blood-soaked crime scene, it was going to be a difficult task.
Even though we made calls earlier in the day to try to locate a possible victim, there had been shift changes and new personnel manning emergency rooms and the OCME. The detectives started by re-contacting more than a dozen hospital emergency rooms in the Greater Boston area. Malden’s only hospital closed the previous year, so by then, most ambulance transports brought the victims to Massachusetts General Hospital or one of several other outstanding Boston trauma centers. The steady answer was, “No, not here, sorry. We will call you if anyone comes in reporting they were the victim of an assault.”
After an hour or so of nothing but no, they turned their attention to checking the teletype files for recent missing persons or unidentified victims of a violent assault, both dead and alive. They started locally but then spread the area of concern throughout New England and eventually nationally. They constructed a message about an apparent arson scene in their town with signs that it was possibly a cover-up for a violent crime. They electronically distributed the message throughout New England hoping the other departments would post it on detective bulletin boards and in dispatch centers and speak about it at shift roll calls. The midnight shifts would be coming on duty shortly, and they would most likely be the ones to take note of any strange encounters from the previous night.
Jimmy Connolly and I remained at the complex for a bit longer, tying up loose ends and making sure to secure the function room doors. At our request, the building manager had had the locks replaced by a locksmith earlier in the day, and the only set of keys was in our possession. The room was still an active crime scene, and just in case a defense counsel raised the issue of evidence contamination or tampering during a trial, we could respond that we closed, locked, and secured the room for the day. Jimmy and I headed home just as the other team members were rolling up on the Fournier home.
My trip home, although punctuated with a lot of uneasiness about unanswered concerns and questions, was more relaxed than the drive to Malden earlier in the day. While we had no known victim, we did have sufficient evidence that had the appearance of a homicide scene. Until we learned otherwise, we would proceed on that premise and not specifically consider it an arson scene. If we waited for a dead body to turn up critical evidence would be lost, altered, or destroyed and rendered useless. Likewise, memories would fade or change as residents shared information with one another, and eyewitnesses might go quiet.
Massachusetts law only requires the local police contact the DAO when they learn of a death, not if or when they suspect one. There was great comfort knowing that our office, the state police, and the DA had worked with the Malden detectives on a number of past homicide cases. The combined detective units shared a genuine respect and camaraderie that allowed us to work together as a harmonious and unified team. I was grateful that they brought us in on the case right away.
From my perspective, we were in a very advantageous situation. Bringing the investigative units together at the beginning of the day eliminated any friction, distrust, or finger pointing about lost or damaged evidence. Likewise, having an ADA working alongside lessened the chances of legal missteps during interviews, searches, or identifications. Gerard Butler was one of the most knowledgeable ADAs, and there was nobody more discerning and thorough than his supervisor, Adrienne Lynch. We were off to a very promising start.
As was always the case in these kinds of mysteries, we had no idea how long it would take to solve and prove. None of us realized we were just a few steps down a long, dirty road with more twists and turns and highs and lows than an amusement park roller coaster. This case could turn out to be the most challenging ride of our careers, but we all buckled in and prepared for whatever lay ahead.
When tragedy struck, the entire system answered the call.
On the morning after Christmas in 2000, the small city of Wakefield, Massachusetts, faced something no one could have expected: a workplace turned into a scene of mass murder. In just a few short minutes, seven people were killed inside a tech company office by one of their own—a quiet employee named Michael McDermott.
The shock didn’t end with the tragedy. It marked the start of the largest homicide investigation in state history. Murderous Rage follows the case from the first police radio call to the final court ruling. Told by one of the lead investigators, this book shows how detectives, prosecutors, and forensic experts worked side by side, piecing together evidence, interviewing witnesses, and staying focused through media pressure and public fear.
Through snowstorms, crowded courtrooms, and hundreds of interviews, the investigative team pushed forward. What they uncovered wasn’t just how the crime happened, but why—and what could have been done to prevent it.
This book isn't about heroes or villains. It’s about professionals doing their jobs with care, teamwork, and a shared commitment to justice for the victims. It’s a powerful look at how real investigations happen, far from the way they’re shown on TV.
Chapter 1: T’was the Day After Christmas
It was Tuesday, the morning after Christmas, and it was brutally cold outside. The thermometer on the kitchen windowsill stayed locked on minus 1 degree. Greater Boston was stuck in an unusually cold weather pattern, and according to the weather folks, a return to normalcy was still days away. Unless skiing up north or playing pond hockey were your passions, it was a good day to stay home and open a book by the fireplace.
I downed two cups of hot coffee and a steaming bowl of oatmeal before I dressed in layers of my warmest clothing and headed out to work. I always enjoyed working the day after Christmas. The day was usually low-key, with a skeleton crew and very few phone calls or visitors. It was what we referred to on the state police as “holiday routine”: a time to catch up on paperwork and take a second or third look at a couple of unfinished investigations. Besides, I preferred saving my days off for a visit to the beach where I’d lather my face with suntan lotion, not Chapstick.
Traffic was thankfully light because the heater fan in my old and tired unmarked state police cruiser was balking and didn’t wheeze out any warmth until I crossed over the Longfellow Bridge, which separates Boston from Cambridge and lies just a few blocks from my office in the Middlesex County Courthouse.
I had my choice of parking spaces because, even though the administrative offices and district courts were open, there was little foot traffic and no superior court trials on the schedule. Once inside, I passed through the safety checkpoint, made a stop at the coffee shop in the lobby, and ordered up two larges before walking up the wide cement staircase to our office on the second floor.
The huge metal doors to the office featured the blue and white circular seal of the Massachusetts State Police, centered and positioned eye-high, leaving no doubt who was on the other side. One door was propped open, and the only one home was Duke Donoghue. He and I would be it for the day. Duke was the newest trooper assigned to the office, and as the “junior man,” it was the norm for him to have the duty call responsibilities for the day after Christmas. On the state police, seniority in rank dictates the bidding for almost everything, including vacations and time off. It has been the case since the inception of the department in 1921. Everyone knows it, and no one complains. As the boss and ranking officer, the reverse was also true: it was my responsibility to be there in case there were any events requiring supervisory decision-making. Duke and I were at the opposite ends of the family spectrum. He was single and without kids, and I was married with two. One was a college freshman, and the other worked as a dispatcher for the Wellesley Police. Therefore, the need to be home with young kids wasn’t an issue for either of us.
In the quiet of the morning, Duke and I had some time to sit and talk without worry of interruption or the need to be somewhere else. I had looked forward to a candid, private conversation about his thoughts and perspectives as he approached his one-year mark in the office. I wanted to know how he felt he was adapting to the world of death investigations, the increased and diverse workload of cases, and the added responsibilities that came with them.
As we sipped our coffee, we talked about the first time we met. It was during the summer of ’91. One weekday afternoon, they randomly assigned us to the same tee box at a state-operated golf course. I had been on the job for fifteen years and was on my first tour at Middlesex as a sergeant. Duke was a year out of college and working for a company doing title searches in the probate courts. As we walked down the first fairway, he started a conversation by asking me where I was a police officer. It pissed me off because identifying myself as a police officer while I was on time off was simply not something I ever did. He would later tell me it was a wild guess. He thought I looked too much like a cop not to be one. Duke looked like a high school kid whose face hadn’t yet known the feel of a razor blade. To make a long story bearable, as we talked, I learned that Duke’s dad was a state trooper who had passed away suddenly when Duke was only ten. I had known his dad. He was a gentleman and natural leader, one of those people that a young trooper could talk to and look up to for mentoring, guidance and instruction with positive feedback. In a para-military agency, that wasn’t always the case. As Duke and I walked the course, we talked and shared a few stories and a couple of laughs. I gave him my card and told him to stay in touch. Fortunately for both of us, he did. He wanted to follow in his father’s footsteps, and I wanted to help him in any way I could. As the son of a cop who couldn’t wait to follow in his own father’s footsteps, I always looked out for others in the same situation.
In 1993, Duke entered the state police academy where, over the following six months, he learned about policing, personal commitment, and self-discipline. He grew and matured while excelling at every phase of the training. After a few years patrolling the highways around Boston, he transferred to the attorney general’s office. He spent his days working on public corruption cases and nights as a fixture in the Boston club scene, working undercover buying significant quantities of ecstasy and ketamine. Duke’s open and friendly style, coupled with his youthful looks, made his work almost effortless. Most nights the dealers looked for him and not the other way around. We spoke one afternoon at a chance meeting at headquarters. He mentioned that he enjoyed the corruption cases but the drug work had grown repetitious, and the challenges were diminishing. As he put it, “I feel like I’m shooting at ducks in a barrel every night at the clubs.”
I asked him if he was ready to take on homicide cases. His face lit up with a smile, and without hesitation, he said, “You know that is my goal. I will jump at the first opportunity.”
A few months later, there was a vacancy in our unit, and I reached out and encouraged him to apply for the position. A month later, after completing the application process and the interviews, Duke’s work address changed from Boston to Cambridge.
We began our impromptu year-in-review with Duke talking about the change in environment and responsibilities and the anxiety and self-doubt that everyone struggles with when they first arrive. He said he questioned whether he had the experience and ability to handle death investigations. He had arrived early in January, a time when things were relatively quiet. As is customary with any new addition to the unit, he shadowed the case officers and responded day and night to all of the reported suicide and unattended deaths in the county, and there were plenty of them. It’s a swift and total immersion into the work and creates a perfect opportunity to meet and learn from the other folks in the office as well as the crime scene specialists, the local detectives, and the crew from the medical examiner’s (ME) office. When he wasn’t going to death scenes, he reviewed old-and-cold homicide cases and just tried to learn and fit in with everyone.
“I had seen dead bodies at motor vehicle fatal scenes, so I knew I could handle the blood and guts part,” he said. “At the AGs, I did a lot of interviews and interrogations and wrote a few search warrants. My real goal was always to do homicides, and I really felt prepared to step up to the next level. But what I hadn’t thought about or realized was the intensity and the demands that are inherent in all homicide cases. Looking back, the drug work was interesting and challenging at times, but there was very little stress. Losing a case was never good, but it also wasn’t the end of the world or career ending. Homicides, though, are a completely different animal. I have to be on my game all the time. Seriously, if I ever lost a case because I messed up and did something wrong, I could never live with myself. The mental angst is by far the hardest part of the work.”
“You were barely here a month when you caught that horrendous murder in Everett,” I said. “What were the odds that your team would have the homicide call that day? That type of a case presents a once-in-a-career scenario, if ever, for most investigators; it may be the most extreme and intense homicide setting you will ever be in.”
“Homicides by explosion are extremely rare,” I continued. “This one was beyond horrific and challenging: a beautiful young woman’s life extinguished in a millisecond when she opened a package with a pipe bomb inside left on her doorstep by an a-hole she refused to date,” I said, shaking my head. “Not to mention that the day had the harshest weather conditions I can ever recall at a crime scene. It was freezing, and the wind was so strong it drove a stinging sleet storm sideways for hours. The MBTA kindly sent us a bus so we could take breaks and warm-up, and a nearby funeral parlor set up a tent with coffee and donuts and warmed it with a propane heater. It was brutal. Add to that a convoluted crime scene that was both inside and outside because the explosion blew out the ceiling, the outer wall, and the kitchen window sending debris, body parts, and evidence in every direction. While we got a quick lead on who might have killed her, the diabolical bastard was on the loose. I can tell you, unquestionably, that it was the most complex crime scene I had experienced in my twenty-six years on the job. I can also say, though, that with our crew, I never doubted we would solve it and every bit of it done right, from the interviews and the search warrants to the crime scene processing and beyond. It was a monumental team effort by everyone and every agency involved. We had him in custody by the end of the night. I couldn’t have been prouder of everyone’s efforts from the call through the conviction.”
Duke replied, “You have talked to me many times about the way things worked in the office, including the checkpoints that were in place to prevent big mistakes from happening and safety nets that provided a soft landing without much damage if you went a little sideways and lost your balance. I understood what you were saying then, but it wasn’t until that day that I actually experienced it. I learned more about teamwork and relying on others to get things done right in those first few hours than at any other time in my career.
“Seriously,” he went on, “I was the new guy, and I wasn’t sure how to take Eddie Forster and his constant ball-breaking. You know, introducing me to people as a college intern, calling me kid, and telling me to get coffees and all that stuff, but when I saw him in action that day, I was impressed. He had some incisive thoughts and ideas, and when we went to the guy’s house, he was very respectful to his mom and sister. In turn, they were cooperative and willing to answer questions and provided us with information that supported probable cause for the warrant. The same with Jimmy Connolly: he was so calm and composed I never doubted that we were going about things the right way. It was incredibly tragic, but it was also a great learning experience for me. Working with the assistant district attorneys and recognizing that we were equal parts of the same team was new as well. I wasn’t used to having them working alongside us from the get-go, but it really was reassuring to have them guiding us through a huge number of legal issues. Tom O’Reilly thinks and acts like us and his experience and explanations of why we do, or don’t do, certain things has not only opened my eyes to the process but also instilled some real confidence in the way I approach things.”
“The beauty of working in Middlesex County,” I explained, “is the diversity that comes with being the largest county in New England. Our jurisdiction not only covers fifty-four cities, towns, and twenty-one major colleges and universities but they are spread out over urban, suburban, and rural areas. Each is unique and different with their own police departments, a variety of political structures, demographics, and geographies. No two are the same. We usually respond to twenty-five to thirty homicides a year and hundreds of other unattended death scenes where the cause of death turns out to be a suicide, accident, natural causes, or in rare cases, undetermined. We get to see a lot of everything and can gather experience and insight quickly, and because of the variety in the cases, you learn to stay open-minded and always on your toes. You learn to follow the evidence and not be predisposed to how you think it might have happened or who must have done it based on a narrow assessment from your limited experience. You may see that kind of thinking in areas where almost all of the homicides are drug- or gang-related with predictable fact patterns, but you will never see that happen in our office.
“I was at the FBI National Academy back in ’95 and taking a class in behavioral analysis taught by one of the agency’s top profilers. One day, toward the end of the program, he stopped me as I was leaving class. ‘I haven’t figured you out,’ he said. ‘You are either the biggest liar I’ve ever met, or you are in the midst of a career that any detective would kill for. No matter what topic I bring up you have had a case or two that fits it. I honestly have never had that happen to me before, and I’ve been teaching this stuff for years.’ I assured him I wasn’t a liar and simply blessed to be constantly in the thick of psychological thrillers. After that exchange, he called on me all the time.
“I’m happy when the facts are simple and straightforward and we wrap up a case in a day or two, but I enjoy it a lot more when we are faced with a true whodunnit and we have to work hard to resolve it with an arrest. A good example is the fire this summer at the condo in Malden. Based on the crime scene and the amount of blood on the carpet and walls, our gut feelings tell us it is a murder, but without a body, we can’t prove it. It is frustrating as hell, but it takes a lot more than a missing body to deter us. I’m hopeful Eddie Forster was right when he said our victim will turn up in the spring thaw and we can move forward with an arrest and prosecution of our person of interest. Discovering a body in that manner may be atypical, but not unheard of, and with Adrienne Lynch as the assistant DA on the case, you know we aren’t going to file it away as a cold case. I am confident we will solve it.”
